In every culture, there exists the need for spectacle—a collective expression of power, joy, and awe. Historically, fireworks have been the embodiment of this need, a visual symphony of light and sound, bursting forth in celebration of national pride, personal milestones, or the passage of time. In these fleeting, fiery explosions, we find an aesthetic that appeals to our most primal desires: the delight in controlled chaos, the thrill of danger just beyond reach.

 

Fireworks are, at their core, a demonstration of our dominion over the natural world—our ability to manipulate and produce wonder from combustible elements. But what we must acknowledge is that the spectacle of fireworks, so seemingly innocent, is itself an ethical problem. The beauty we find in these dazzling displays comes at a cost that society has long ignored. It is not just the cost of fire and destruction, though that is the most visible and violent outcome. It is also the cost to human health, to the creatures with whom we share the earth, and to the air we all breathe.

 

In high fire-risk areas, fireworks are more than simply a cultural artifact—they are a deliberate risk to life. We cannot separate the aesthetic of fireworks from the reality of their effects. Between 2017 and 2021, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) reported an average of 19,500 fires annually caused by fireworks. In 2022, a year already ravaged by an unprecedented fire season, fireworks were responsible for over 31,302 incidents across the United States.

 

These are not accidents; they are predictable outcomes of human indulgence in a dangerous art form. California, with its vast landscapes now parched from decades of drought, has become a case study in the perils of this practice. The state’s fire season, no longer confined to the summer months, stretches year-round. It is a place where every spark is a potential conflagration, where a single firework can raze entire communities.

​

The El Dorado Fire of 2020, ignited by a gender-reveal fireworks gone awry, burned over 22,000 acres. Burning over a 71-day period, the fire destroyed 20 structures and resulted in one firefighter fatality, for which the couple hosting the party was charged with involuntary manslaughter. The financial toll exceeded $8 million, but the human toll—lives displaced, ecosystems ravaged—is beyond calculation.

 

One might argue that such incidents are anomalies, exceptions in an otherwise benign tradition. But this line of thinking overlooks the deeper ethical implications of fireworks. The pursuit of spectacle at the expense of safety and environmental health is not an innocent act; it is a willful disregard for the fragility of the world we inhabit.

 

We have become accustomed to the immediacy of pleasure, to the belief that momentary joy justifies long-term harm. The problem is not merely that fireworks cause fires—it is that we continue to permit them to do so, out of nostalgia for a ritual that can no longer be sustained.

 

The destructive power of fireworks extends beyond fire. The very chemicals that produce their vibrant colors—barium for green, strontium for red—are toxic. A 2019 study from the University of Nevada found that fireworks cause air pollution spikes of over 370%, releasing metal particles that settle in our water, our soil, and our lungs. What we celebrate as a harmless burst of beauty is, in fact, an assault on the environment, a localized disaster repeated annually in cities and towns across the world. And yet, it is not only the land that suffers. The human body itself is vulnerable to the dangers of this tradition.

 

In 2023 alone, fireworks were responsible for over 9,500 injuries and 8 deaths in the United States, according to the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). These injuries are not confined to careless adults or thrill-seekers; they disproportionately affect children. In that same year, nearly 1,200 children under the age of five were injured by fireworks. The victims are often innocent bystanders, passive participants in a cultural practice that prioritizes spectacle over safety.

 

But perhaps the most damning evidence of the ethical failure of fireworks lies in their impact on those least able to defend themselves: animals. For our pets, the loud, unpredictable explosions provoke panic and confusion. Shelters report a 40% increase in lost pets following major fireworks events, with terrified animals fleeing the noise, often to their detriment.

 

For wildlife, the consequences are even more severe. Birds, startled from their nests, collide with buildings and trees in desperate attempts to escape. In 2011, a fireworks display in Beebe, Arkansas, caused the deaths of nearly 5,000 red-winged blackbirds as they plunged to the ground, disoriented and terrified.

 

Marine life is also endangered by fireworks launched over bodies of water, where the chemicals and debris contaminate ecosystems, poisoning fish and other aquatic species.

​

Bees seem to be especially prone to suffer, with the vibrations from fireworks destroying their sense of orientation.

 

How, then, do we reconcile this ethical dilemma? How do we honor our need for spectacle while mitigating the risks it imposes on the environment, on our bodies, and on the creatures that share this planet with us? The answer could lie in the human capability for innovation, here the evolving technology of drone light shows.

Drones, unlike fireworks, offer an alternative that is both aesthetically captivating and ethically sound. Where fireworks are chaotic and fleeting, drones are precise and programmable. Guided by GPS, they can be choreographed into intricate, evolving patterns in the sky, producing a spectacle of light that rivals any firework display in complexity and beauty.

 

In 2018, a drone show above the Great Wall of China used 1,500 drones to create vast, shifting murals in the night sky. The show lasted longer than a traditional fireworks display and, crucially, left no toxic chemicals, no smoke, no fires. The silent choreography of the drones was an aesthetic experience that did not require destruction to achieve its impact.Drone shows, too, offer a more inclusive form of spectacle.

 

For veterans with PTSD, who are often re-traumatized by the sudden, explosive sounds of fireworks, the quiet hum of drones presents a safer alternative.

For children and pets, for whom the cacophony of fireworks induces terror, drones offer the same visual wonder without the accompanying fear.

The appeal of drones is not merely their lack of danger but their potential to create a spectacle that is more accessible, more inclusive, and more respectful of the world around us.

Indeed, the question is not whether we can replace fireworks with drones, but why we have not done so already.

 

In an era where climate change has made fire risk a constant threat, where the environmental and human costs of fireworks are indisputable, our continued use of fireworks is not only reckless but indefensible.

 

The cultural attachment to fireworks is rooted in nostalgia, but nostalgia is not a justification for harm.  We must move beyond the allure of harmful spectacles  and embrace a new form of celebration that does not come at the expense of our health and future.

 

The rise of drone shows is not just a technological innovation—it is an ethical imperative. In high fire-risk areas, the graceful choreography of drones must replace the violent, unpredictable explosion of fireworks. To continue otherwise is to accept a world where spectacle outweighs responsibility, where beauty is synonymous with destruction.

 

The future of celebration must reflect the reality of the world we live in: fragile, interconnected, and deserving of our respect. Drones, not fireworks, offer a path forward—a spectacle that illuminates the sky without darkening the world below.